User talk:Rsocol

If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Rsocol}} on your talk. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome to the Commons, Rsocol!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Ro.wiki

Thanks. Evrik (talk) 14:37, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

File:PHIL 3 lores.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 18:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

The template mentioned above was the speedy delete template, because I mistakenly uploaded the file with a wrong name. Razvan Socol (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 2f0b1163858677d77dfe52046c88c170

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Statue of Avram Iancu (Targu Mures).jpg

File:Statue of Avram Iancu (Targu Mures).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Powers (talk) 14:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

zhang

Hi, you said: "same image appears at many news sites". can you give me a hint, at which sites? --Алый Король (talk) 15:03, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Mostly Chinese sites: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. You can use Google Image Search to find other copies of a particular picture. Razvan Socol (talk) 18:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for marking copyvio

Hello, thanks for marking the copyvio of Cheryl Cole

Neozoon (talk) 19:35, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Rsocol. You have new messages at Andrei Stroe's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Rsocol, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Another kitten for you!

Thanks for marking the copyviolation of File:Crown Princess Mary of denmark.jpg

Neozoon (talk) 20:09, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Check your facts

http://www.flickr.com/photos/emotionaltoothpaste/2186000759/ Dken5 (talk)

Well, the image File:Shelby Steele.jpg is a tv screenshoot (obviously), even if it was photographed (not copied directly from a TV tuner software). The person who uploaded the file on Flickr did so with disregard to the TV station's copyrights. Additionally, the CC-BY-NC-ND license is not compatible with Commons. Razvan Socol (talk) 07:23, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Question about image deletion

Hi, I'm a new Wikipedia user. You've User:Rsocol recently removed three images I had uploaded for a page that I'm working on in my user sandbox in Wikipedia which you can see under MonaMG/Sandbox. The photos I had uploaded from the artist's website into commons are for the page that I'm updating Nader Guirat on wikipedia. I had requested permission to use the photos by sending an email to the artist's management who own the photos and they gave me permission to use the photos. Please advise how to resolve this issue and upload the photos again. Thank you for your help. --Mona MG (talk) 11:37, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

You need to forward the email with the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, but please make sure that the copyright holder agrees to license the photos under a free license. See Commons:OTRS and Commons:Email templates for more information. Razvan Socol (talk) 11:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Question About Image Deletion - Update

Hi again. Re. my previous inquiry and per your advise. I've contacted the owners and they confirmed that an email with a link to the image files was sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org yesterday Monday Nov. 14th. Please advise what would be the next step to take. Thank you again for all your help.--Mona MG (talk) 06:26, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Alexe Church, Bucharest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI--Jebulon 16:14, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Question About Images Deletion - Update II

Hi again. sorry to keep bothering you with this. I've followed your advice and waited for the images to be restored or a response from OTRS but received neither so far. So, I sent an ‘undelete’ request, reference 1.90, as you had suggested, and I mentioned the OTRS email, your name and included the file names as well, however again no response, in-fact there were responses to other ‘undelete’ requests entered after mine, so mine was passed over. Appreciate your kind assisance once again! Best Regards --Mona MG (talk) 10:25, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry to keep bothering you, but as you can see there is no response from anyone even on the notice board post..I don't understand this?? I seek your help yet again. Many Thanks!!--Mona MG (talk) 23:18, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Message from Pill moved to User talk:Mona MG

Hello, Rsocol. You have new messages at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Ticket_number_.232011030410006577. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Help

Hello , can you help me please ?--Dadam97490 (talk) 17:56, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Dacia

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Dacia as a sister project to WP:DACIA and WP:DACIA to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 23:27, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

US stamps published after 1978

Ooops, my mistake. Was unaware of this. I'll re-load them on wikipedia with a fair-use claim then. Please allow me a few hours to move them then delete them at the end of the day. Bwmoll3 (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I'm sure they will be removed quickly. Bwmoll3 (talk) 18:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

File:JoJo.jpg

File:JoJo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 16:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Centrul de comunicații prin satelit de la Cheia (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. QI for me. --Ralf Roletschek 20:43, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Stergeri directori de scoala

Prietene de ce propui la stergere? Au licenta de la Lupea autorul Monografiei. Asybaris01 (talk) 10:06, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Toate materialele luate de la Lupea au licenta libera, vezi [:ro:http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discu%C8%9Bie:Racovi%C8%9Ba,_Sibiu tichetul]. Daca ai nelamuriri intreaba-l pe japonez ca stie mai bine. Asybaris01 (talk) 10:11, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Mănăstirea Cheia (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments The crop is a little bit tight IMO. Otherwise good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:45, 13 January 2012 (UTC) Recropped. --Rsocol 08:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)  Support Fixed distortion. Good to go now. --Iifar 10:29, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Romania

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

MAPN

Salut,

Până la urmă ai dat curs sugestiei mele de la Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard/Archive_18#Ticket_number_.232011030410006577 cu privire la licența de pe site-ul MAPN? Ai primit vreun răspuns?--Strainu (talk) 14:28, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Nu, nu le-am scris. Până una alta, o să consider și eu că permisiunea se referea la orice imagini de pe http://www.mapn.ro/fotodb (cred că o să mai încarc niște imagini de acolo, pentru diverși miniștri). Razvan Socol (talk) 15:51, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Exista vreun template pentru pozele astea? Cred ca ar fi util--Codrin.B (talk) 16:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Oare? S-ar putea să atragă mai multă atenție nedorită, dacă înțelegi ce vreau să spun.--Strainu (talk) 10:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Atata timp cat permisiunile sunt puse la punct prin OTRS, eu cred ca e ok. Dar inteleg ce zici. E plin de dusmani. --Codrin.B (talk) 04:20, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Nu știu dacă e o problemă etnică, paranoia, "deletionism" sau un amestec. Cert e că ne-au făcut să pierdem destul de mult timp aiurea. Încep să mă gândesc serios dacă n-ar fi timpul pentru propria bibliotecă de imagini, așa cum și-au făcut canadienii propriul Wikisource. Din ce citesc pe listele de discuții, nu sunt singurul, mai ales după decizia curții supreme a SUA privitoare la reinstaurarea drepturilor de autor în 1996.--Strainu (talk) 11:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Hotel Select in Iaşi

Mă bucur că s-a pus în discuţie această problemă , eu nu aş fi îndrăznit să deranjez pe cineva pentru a cere un sfat sau o părere. Mă bucur că unul din contribuitorii la categorie a ridicat problema.

Am eliminat legătura de subordonare a Category:Hotel Select in Iaşi ca subcategorie a Category:Palaces in Iaşi deoarece aceasta avea ca subcategorie şi Category:Palatul Neuschotz. Era anormal ca această categorie, "Palaces in Iaşi" să aibă ca subcategorii două ipostaze ale aceleiaşi clădiri , una ţinând de funcţia ei actuală (hotel), şi alta ţinând de istoria sa (ca palat).

Cele 4 imagini din categoria mai sus amintită au fost introduse de mine şi în Category:Palatul Neuschotz, pentru a ilustra ambele ipostaze ale acestei clădiri, dar nu mi se pare normal ca la "Palaces in Iaşi" să avem două subcategorii pentru funcţii diferite ale aceleaşi clădiri. Dar în final, mă voi supune părerii majorităţii. --Argenna (talk) 18:55, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Actress Lindsay Lohan.jpg

File:Actress Lindsay Lohan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.

 

High Contrast (talk) 16:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

The page [6] attributes the photo to Rafael Amado Deras/Flickr. Additionally, the enstar.com article is published in 2012, while the photo was posted to Flickr in 2008. Razvan Socol (talk) 17:04, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Classic issue of file washing and this was falsely attributed. --High Contrast (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Actress Lindsay Lohan.jpg

File:Actress Lindsay Lohan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 17:10, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Sinaia Casino.jpg

File:Sinaia Casino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

128.250.5.245 07:56, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Commons-sickness

Vezi, d-asta prefer eu să evit discuțiile de ștergere aici. Omul n-are acces la coada info-ro, așa că pentru el nu există tichetul respectiv.--Strainu (talk) 08:36, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Category:1929 in Romania

Hi! You removed Category:Tamara Buciuceanu from Category:1929 in Romania, which is debatable, but let's say it's acceptable since there is no such thing as a category like Category:1929 births in Romania which could bridge the two. However, you made the comment that the Category:1929 in Romania should contain pictures taken that year, and with that I would have a problem. I couldn't find anywhere such an interpretation for that "by year category", nor any guidelines. If you know about some, please point me to them. But please take a look at Category:1953 in Germany. It contains everything that happened in Germany in 1953 regardless of when the pictures were taken, which is logical. That includes subcategories like Category:1953 works in Germany‎ -> Category:1953 church bells in Germany‎ as well. So if someone took a picture of a 1953 German church bell in 2010, that picture belongs here! And please let me know when you have comments on my work or want me to correct/undo something. I would prefer dialog and communication than discovering things undone. Best! --Codrin.B (talk) 18:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

BTW, I would a category that would fit your statement, i.e. should contain pictures taken that year: Category:1929 photographs.--Codrin.B (talk) 19:05, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Actually the category goes well back in time. See Category:208 in China. So it should be clear that it has mostly to do with history and events, than with photos dated to that year. --Codrin.B (talk) 19:17, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for not notifying you about my revert. I have considered Category:1929 in France or Category:1929 in Switzerland. Razvan Socol (talk) 05:07, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

I see. Well they are wrong and contradicting themselves. As a "photographs" category cannot contain "works" and "events" subcategories, but it does. I clarified the scope for the Romania related categories.--Codrin.B (talk) 06:32, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Rsocol, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 06:07, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Gull near Danube (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good. --A.Savin 09:55, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:House of the Spark (Casa Scânteii).jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:27, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Fișiere

Nu este vina mea.Eu decât am transferat cum spunea pe ro.wp.Receptie123 (talk) 10:52, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Într-adevăr, problema este cauzată în primul rând de cei care au încărcat inițial fișierele respective. Totuși, am de gând să verific toate fișierele care au fost transferate de tine la Commons până acum, deoarece aici se verifică mai strict regulile decât pe ro.wiki. Te rog să nu mai transferi alte fișiere decât dacă ești sigur că imaginile respective au fost produse de către cel care le-a încărcat la ro.wiki și dacă nu sunt încălcate drepturile de autor ale altcuiva (de exemplu, conform Commons:Freedom of Panorama, clădirile sau sculpturile din România pot fi încărcate la Commons doar dacă arhitectul sau sculptorul respectiv a murit cu mai mult de 70 de ani în urmă). Razvan Socol (talk) 11:18, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Dacă este alt caz cum pot să verific?Receptie123 (talk) 11:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Dacă ai vreo îndoială asupra drepturilor de autor asupra unui fișier marcat pentru transferare la Commons, cel mai bine este să sari peste el, lăsându-l altor utilizatori mai experimentați. Dacă o imagine pare a fi "prea bună" pentru a fi realizată de cel care a încărcat-o, poți să o cauți cu http://images.google.com ca să vezi dacă apare și în alte locuri, dar e important să verifici data la care a fost încărcat la Wikipedia și data la care a fost publicat în celelalte locuri, ca să vezi în ce sens a fost copiată imaginea. Dacă este vorba despre o clădire sau o sculptură, ar trebui să te interesezi cine a fost arhitectul sau sculptorul și să verifici când a murit. Un alt criteriu important sunt datele din tag-ul EXIF al imaginilor, care prezintă informații despre aparatul de fotografiat cu care a fost realizată imaginea. Dar cel mai simplu, dacă ai vreun dubiu, lasă imaginea respectivă în pace sau scrie-mi mie. Razvan Socol (talk) 11:30, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Mulțumesc pentru ajutor.Așa voi face! Am treabă săptămâna viitoare.Voi continua pe Wikipedia din 1 iunie.Receptie123 (talk) 12:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

---

Răzvan, o parte din vină o port eu. L-am rugat pe Receptie123 să transfere tot ce găsește în ro:C:TLC, iar pentru că majoritatea din fișierele alea le-am etichetat eu, vina îmi aparține mie (prin decizia că „acest fișier poate fi transferat la commons”). Anyways, ceea ce se șterge de la commons trebuia mai devreme sau mai târziu șters și de la rowiki — pe mine nu mă doare că se șterg fișierele, vreau doar să îi garantez lui Receptie123 un mediu cât mai liniștit de lucru în efortul său de transfer a imaginilor libere la commons. Numai bine. //  Gikü  said  done  Sunday, 2 June 2013 17:29 (UTC)

Bine, cred că s-a cam încheat discuția.În concluzie Voi continua să transfere fișiere de la ro.wp la Commons pentru că (cum a contatat și Gikü) ori se șterg la commons or la ro.wp (este aproape același lucru).

Am o rugăminte.Este posibil dacă se propun pentru ștergere să nu fiu avertizat eu (nu sunt fișierele mele)?Receptie123 (talk) 06:27, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Gikü, dacă ai fi transferat tu (sau alt utilizator cu experiență) acele fișiere la Commons, cred că ai mai fi verificat încă odată dacă tag-ul privind drepturile de autor este cel corect, le-ai fi încadrat în categoria cea mai potrivită, ai fi completat descrierea acolo unde lipsește și, mai ales, ai fi răspuns la mesajele privind acele fișiere. Dacă nu facem toate astea, mai bine nu le mai transferăm deloc, pentru că unele dintre fișierele care nu ar fi acceptabile la Commons ar putea fi păstrate la ro.wiki, ca fair-use, dacă sunt imagini valoroase, relevante pentru articolele respective.

Receptie123, obiceiul (încetățenit de mult timp) este ca cel care încarcă fișierul să fie cel avertizat în caz că acel fișier este propus pentru ștergere. Dacă nu ești dispus sau nu ești capabil să răspunzi la acele avertismente, atunci nu mai transfera fișierele respective la Commons. Te rog să scoți mesajul respectiv din antetul paginii tale de discuție. Astfel, dacă vrea cineva să-ți scrie vreun mesaj, măcar am o șansă să îl văd eu sau Gikü. Razvan Socol (talk) 05:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Bine am înteles amândouă lucrurile (2. de pe pagina mea de utilizator).Voi reveni la greșelile care le-am făcut.Receptie123 (talk) 14:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Tropaeum Traiani

salut. Exista trei monumente descoperite in cadrul tropaeum traiani. Monumentul Memorial dedicat legiunii disparute in Dacia (XXI rapax sau alta :)) monumentul unui general roman presupus multa vreme a fi cornelius fuscus si tropeum traiani. Mormantul din imagine nu se gaseste in oras ci la 40 de m de monumentul triumfal de la adamclisi. CristianChirita (talk)

Înțeleg că File:UnknownRomanGeneralTomb2.JPG și File:UnknownRomanGeneralTomb.JPG trebuie să rămână în categoria Category:Tropaeum Traiani (nu în Category:Civitas Tropaensium, unde le mutasem eu), așa că le voi muta la loc. Razvan Socol (talk) 16:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Baia de aramă

Încarci tu și restul fișierelor? Dacă da, dă-mi și mie un mesaj când termini, ca să le validez licența.--Strainu (talk) 10:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Romania dates

It had Philippine times Fixed. Platonides (talk) 18:20, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

A temporary block to control the damage would have been appropiate. It was lucky that I saw your message quite fast. I reverted those bot edits. Platonides (talk) 18:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Rsocol, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Rsocol, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Commons:Photo challenge/2014 - May - Flowers AND insects/Voting

Please can you re-do your voting for this. I had to remove File:Laab im Walde - Bärenberg - Gelbwürfeliger Dickkopffalter (Carterocephalus palaemon).jpg as it did not contain a flower. You gave it 2 points. -- Colin (talk) 06:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Done. Thanks, Razvan Socol (talk) 07:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Rsocol. You have new messages at Strainu's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Rsocol. You have new messages at Strainu's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Rsocol. You have new messages at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Files_uploaded_by_Mmoru. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Photo challenge

I've replied on my talk page. If you can do the "Winners" pages that would be a big help. If you have any questions, leave a message on my talk page and I'll try to answer this evening. But I won't have time to do the Winners pages till much later this evening without your help. And it would be very useful if someone else was capable of doing this. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Mănăstirea Cheia (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI imo, good view.--ArildV 06:50, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Palatul Parlamentului și Bulevardul Unirii, Zilele Bucureștiului 2014.JPG

And also:

• File:Palatul Parlamentului, Zilele Bucureștiului 2014.JPG

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Carlos Coelho.jpg

And also:

• File:Mihnea Motoc.jpg

Yours sincerely, 106.68.123.120 13:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)