User talk:Multichill

Always busy.

Welcome to my talk page. Use it; don't send me e-mail. I reply to messages left on my talk, on my talk page. If I left a message on your talk page, I will reply there (unless you specify otherwise).

Archives October 2007 December 2007 January 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 December 2009 January 2010 February 2010 March 2010 April 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 September 2010 October 2010 November 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 August 2011 September 2011 October 2011 November 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 May 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 September 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 February 2013 March 2013 April 2013 May 2013 June 2013 July 2013 August 2013 September 2013 October 2013 November 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 March 2014 April 2014 May 2014 June 2014 July 2014 August 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015

File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Portret van een weefster achter een weeftoestel en een Mekkagangster TMnr 60046757.jpg and others with the {{KIT license}}

Hi, Multichill, are these files no longer free to use? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 04:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Collage34.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Collage34.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Collage34.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— ξ^xplicit 04:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Dinosaur Park.jpg

File:Dinosaur Park.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 20:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Collage34.jpg

File:Collage34.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— ξ^xplicit 01:31, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

File:US Navy 111006-O-GR159-001 An F-35C test aircraft piloted by Lt. Christopher Tabert launches from a from a degraded test catapult.jpg

File:US Navy 111006-O-GR159-001 An F-35C test aircraft piloted by Lt. Christopher Tabert launches from a from a degraded test catapult.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LV-CIH (talk) 01:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Erma_river_on_Tran_-_Nikola_Petrov.jpg

Hi Multichill, yesterday I uploaded a new version of this image, with a higher resolution (1024 × 741 pixels, as opposed to the original 352 × 245). Only afterwards I noticed that someone had uploaded an even higher resolution image (1600 × 1143 pixels) on April 15, which you reverted to the smaller original resolution. Please explain your revert. Is the high resolution version deficient in ways that I haven't noticed? Greetings,--Ratzer (talk) 19:37, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

@Ratzer: please have a look at Commons:Overwriting existing files, it's a completely different file so you should upload it under a different name. Multichill (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

I think I understand Commons:Overwriting existing files. I only don't understand in what way it is a "completely different file". It is exactly the same file, with some parameters (resolution, luminosity, etc.) being different. In any case, I did upload the file under a different name, because I find it unacceptable that a better version of the same file is reset to a worse one.--Ratzer (talk) 11:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Starr 030525-0014 Hibiscus ovalifolius.jpg

File:Starr 030525-0014 Hibiscus ovalifolius.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 15:34, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Starr 030525-0014 Hibiscus ovalifolius.jpg

File:Starr 030525-0014 Hibiscus ovalifolius.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 02:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

File:US Navy 090422-N-1688B-424 teelworker 1st Class Kajuna Strickland, left, and Information Systems Technician 3rd Class Cameran Heckenlaible hand out candy to children at the Balise School in Port Gentl during an Africa Partnersh.jpg

File:US Navy 090422-N-1688B-424 teelworker 1st Class Kajuna Strickland, left, and Information Systems Technician 3rd Class Cameran Heckenlaible hand out candy to children at the Balise School in Port Gentl during an Africa Partnersh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

62.92.48.66 08:07, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Uploading images - python

Hi! Can I steal some of your time? A Python newbie wants to create a script for image uploading from one Wikipedia to another (the standart ones doesn't provide features, what will be needed in final version of script)... Here is the current code:

import pywikibot

from scripts import upload

site = pywikibot.Site("en", "wikipedia")
image = "File:Project X Poster.jpg"
page = pywikibot.Page(site,image)
imagePage = pywikibot.FilePage(site,image)
desc = "Tests"

bot = upload.UploadRobot(url=imagePage.fileUrl(), description=desc,
								 keepFilename=True,
                                 verifyDescription=False, ignoreWarning=True,
                                 targetSite=pywikibot.Site('lv',
                                                           'wikipedia'))
bot.run()

But it gives error: AttributeError: 'HTTPMessage' object has no attribute 'getheader'. I'm probably just doing something silly, right? I get also warning url as string is deprecated. Use an iterable instead., but that can probably wait. --Edgars2007 (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:9 - Unknown - 20510665 - RCE.jpg

File:9 - Unknown - 20510665 - RCE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.215.210.32 22:42, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Image from "Wikidata and GLAM intermediate workshop"

Hi Maarten, my images from the Wikimania sesseion "Wikidata and GLAM intermediate workshop" are online now: Category:Wikimania 2016 - Wikidata and GLAM intermediate workshop. /cc Alex. Raymond 17:22, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Raymond! I hope you had a nice relaxing holiday after Wikimania. Multichill (talk) 17:43, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Copenhagen on fire 1807 by CW Eckersberg.jpg

Hi Multichill. You reintroduced a 2006 version of this file with the description "Commons:Overwriting existing files:". You gave no details, so could you please be more specific, considering the fact that the newer file was giving a much better representation of the painting? If it has something to do with "changing original license", I think you have been too strict about the blessings of the "PD-Old" license. It is still there - just specified. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 10:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

The overwrite was in violation of Commons:Overwriting existing files (and part of a larger set) and had nothing to do with the license. Feel free to take the better version and upload it under a different name. Multichill (talk) 10:11, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for being so ignorant, but what I see is "replacement with higher resolution versions of the same file" - meaning a better scan or photo of the same painting. Do you really think we should retain every stamp-sized (or similar) pic that someone found on the internet? --Rsteen (talk) 10:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

It's not the same file. If I take a photo of a painting and I have a low and a high resolution version, the high resolution photo can be uploaded over the low resolution one. If I have two different photos of the same painting, that is not allowed. Just upload it under a different name. And yes, we keep every old version, but the difference is that if you upload a new version, the old version can't be used on Wikipedia. If you upload it under a different name, our (re-)users can choose which image the want to use. In both cases the files take up exactly as much disk space.

The background is that Commons wants to over choice to the re-users, in particular with paintings we've had big issues with users who overwrote existing painting images with "better" images (as in, higher resolution), but the colors were completely different. Multichill (talk) 10:33, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Well, after reading the discussion, I can see that there is basis for your action in the guidelines. However, you could have been more helpful to fellow users by telling them which part of the guidelines they were violating. I am sure everybody here have been acting in good faith, but you were not reverting a "contested" image, you were just making an inferior version stand out as the current version. You may have been providing choice, but at the same time you are forcing people to re-upload better versions, for something that seems to just be a matter of principle. Principles are important, but there is a fine line between being pedantic and being pragmatic. --Rsteen (talk) 11:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Giovanni Antonio Canal

Hi Multichill, do you think this list is an improvement?. It is not a real list..It is not going to stay like this hopefully--Oursana (talk) 11:32, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Oursana, the listeria list you mean? I added that because Wikidata appeared to be much more complete than the gallery here. Feel free to do anything with it. Multichill (talk) 14:16, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Pilatus2006 picture 056.jpg

File:Pilatus2006 picture 056.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anidaat (talk) 10:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Pilatus2006 picture 060.jpg

File:Pilatus2006 picture 060.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anidaat (talk) 10:20, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Pilatus2006 picture 073.jpg

File:Pilatus2006 picture 073.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anidaat (talk) 10:21, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Pilatus2006 picture 074.jpg

File:Pilatus2006 picture 074.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anidaat (talk) 10:21, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Pilatus2006 picture 185.jpg

File:Pilatus2006 picture 185.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anidaat (talk) 10:22, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Pilatus2006 picture 186.jpg

File:Pilatus2006 picture 186.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anidaat (talk) 10:22, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Pilatus2006 picture 188.jpg

File:Pilatus2006 picture 188.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anidaat (talk) 10:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Pilatus2006 picture 190.jpg

File:Pilatus2006 picture 190.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Anidaat (talk) 10:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Logo spa.JPG

File:Logo spa.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 12:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:Potd_templates_by_date

Category:Potd_templates_by_date has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Auntof6 (talk) 06:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Convergentie model.jpg

File:Convergentie model.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 06:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Reclame van linksboven naar rechts beneden.JPG

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Reclame van linksboven naar rechts beneden.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

Vera ^(talk) 08:13, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Redbird plaque.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Redbird plaque.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 20:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

@Jcb: waar zijn jullie in hemelsnaam mee bezig? Dit is een upload van meer dan 10 jaar oud waarvan de beschrijving door allerhande mensen alleen maar beroerder is gemaakt en nu plak je er lukraak een sjabloon op? Je bent toch geen machine? Multichill (talk) 20:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Als ik in je bijdragen kijk dan zie ik allerlei dingen fout gaan zoals bij File:Red-footed Booby (Sula sula) flying.jpg, File:Red ribbon.gif & File:Red Dead Redemption Logo.png. Man, man, waar ben je mee bezig? Multichill (talk) 20:37, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Chowmahalla palace inside.jpg

File:Chowmahalla palace inside.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Gunnex (talk) 19:43, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Borra-caves4 vzg.jpg

File:Borra-caves4 vzg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 20:29, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Kakateeya Sculpture.jpg

File:Kakateeya Sculpture.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 20:30, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Szekely Land issues.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Szekely Land issues.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Mlpearc (open channel) 03:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Székely counties towns.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Székely counties towns.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Mlpearc (open channel) 03:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Own work

Hello Multichill, I did see that the files were tagged "own work" but, shouldn't OTRS have a release from you for wikimedia to use your files. I don't think the act of uploading infers permission. Mlpearc (open channel) 15:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

OTRS is only used to document third party releases. If I take a photo or draw a map and upload it here its my own work. No need to document that in OTRS. Multichill (talk) 16:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Artwork

Thank you kindly note that I do not wish to use the model: ArtWork for my captions. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: you don't own your uploads. You might want to read Commons:Ownership of pages and files. Multichill (talk) 11:36, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you I'm here long enough to know the rules. The model can be used but it is not mandatory. If information is missing toutjours I am ready to change the captions. Too dirigiste model will kill Wikipedia. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:36, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

So you know starting an edit war is not cool. I started a topic at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Archaeodontosaurus.

Ok good idea --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:55, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

It seems the problem is to place the caption template for Wikidata. Such as <nowiki> | Wikidata Q3618192 = <nowiki>. I'm not opposed. It is only necessary that this template is compatible with the model. As you can verify I enjoy working for Wikidata. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:RodeRotshaan.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:RodeRotshaan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:RodeRotshaan.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Jcb (talk) 21:23, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Why did a bot delete all the source info. In this case this info is not the proper original source info (which is given in the description), but has this bot also removed these source info templates on valid files/how can it know the info was not valid here? Basvb (talk) 08:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Octopus-bovenzijde.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Octopus-bovenzijde.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rogstaekerslegende10.jpeg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rogstaekerslegende10.jpeg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Rogstaekerslegende10.jpeg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Majorettetoyotahilux.jpg

File:Majorettetoyotahilux.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

OSX (talk • contributions) 04:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:V-2-Nederlands.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:V-2-Nederlands.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi

Would you mind fixing the problem at . File:V-2-Nederlands.jpg "(Undo revision 207239379 by Ellin Beltz (talk). Does have a source, just messed up by the bots)", not just reverting the "no source". If the file does have a source, please take the time to fix the template, instead of just tossing it back on the pile to be done. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

File:V-2-Nederlands.jpg

File:V-2-Nederlands.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Diatomee.jpg

File:Diatomee.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:07, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Octopus-bovenzijde.jpg

File:Octopus-bovenzijde.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Zeekomkommer-insluitselen.jpg

File:Zeekomkommer-insluitselen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Octopus-onderzijde.jpg

File:Octopus-onderzijde.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Hydra-Foto.jpg

File:Hydra-Foto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Neusaap.jpg

File:Neusaap.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Vlieg-monddelen-zuigorgaan.jpg

File:Vlieg-monddelen-zuigorgaan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Kiezelspons.jpg

File:Kiezelspons.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Vlieg-uiteinde-poot-voet.jpg

File:Vlieg-uiteinde-poot-voet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Cobego-met-jong.jpg

File:Cobego-met-jong.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Routebeschrijving Anglo Dutch Reliability Trial 1912.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Routebeschrijving Anglo Dutch Reliability Trial 1912.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:53, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Routebeschrijving Anglo Dutch Reliability Trial 1912.jpg

File:Routebeschrijving Anglo Dutch Reliability Trial 1912.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fæ (talk) 01:20, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kaartnbds.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kaartnbds.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 20:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Kaartnbds.jpg

File:Kaartnbds.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fæ (talk) 21:19, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

ErfgoedBot

Hello Multichill, While ErfgoedBot is doing its work of categorizing images uploaded during recent WLM, I want to ask if it will affect categorizings images of WLM Pakistan if I make changes to Pakistani heritgae lists on Wikipedia and relevant templates such as en:Template:PKmonument row and Template:PKmonument header? I am going to remove the existing ID numbers and add new ones. Please advice should I start working on it or wait until the 10,000+ files in Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Pakistan categorise by this bot. --Saqib (talk) 08:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)