User talk:Jarekt

Unless you request otherwise, I will reply on this page to messages posted on this page. Add it to your watchlist! If I left a message on your talkpage, regarding missing license and you would like to contact me please check my FAQ page first. If you still have a question, please leave a note on the bottom of this talk page by clicking Add topic link on the top right of the page. It would be very helpful if you mention the file in question using [[:File:file name.jpg]] format and sign your name by adding "~~~~".

Archives 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Lavlja nastamba and Spiljski lav

I am author of photos. I take them in Zagreb Zoo with my private photo camera..--August Dominus (talk) 3:39, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Perły z lamusa

Na czym polega problem i jak mogę go rozwiązać?

Perły z lamusa

Nigdzie tego nie znalazłem, wstawiłem to bo nie wiedziałem co mam wstawić do szablonu licencji.

File:Radiohead Curfew advert.jpg

Hi. You tagged File:Radiohead Curfew advert.jpg as missing license information. Forgive me, but despite years of Wiki experience, I still find uploading/licensing media extremely confusing, and always seem to get something wrong. I can't figure out how I should correct the file.

I do not own the image copyright, but I emailed the owner asking for permission, and he granted Wiki full permission, which I have forwarded to the relevant address. (I think.)

What do I need to do? ̴̴̴̴

Davidng913 Deletion Request

Jarekt,

If you read this, you may delete the article of the MP54AC that must be deleted due to copyright issues.

Davidng913

File:One could still feel the smell of fear. by Erik Pevernagie.jpg

Thank you for your attention. I added :

license

Hi I got your message. I used the template provided by Wikimedia Commons to upload the files. I don't understand exactly what you expect from me, I am not a specialist. These pictures are genuine and I took them myself. I believe they are a nice addition to the article. kindly help if you can — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imageuploader2 (talk • contribs) 14:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Actually I believe I did the necessary correction now. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 91.151.231.20 (talk) 15:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

William Hobart Sr Steel House Polecat Road

Jarekt,

I have grown up using this vacation home at the address that this Wikimedia page refers to. Would you please contact me by email alxhbvo@aol.com or by phone so that you can walk me through how to edit this page? The photograph and some of the text is inaccurate.

Thank you,

Alex Hobart Bravo (937) 339-6845 —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 104.240.165.88 (talk) 15:29, 06 July 2016 (UTC)

Translation question

This was archived without answer. Can you answer please?--Ma▀▄Ga 15:03, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

I am sorry. I forgot about that one. So you are wondering about MediaWiki:Tooltip-n-randomimage. Yes it does not have any translations. However I do not know where it is used, I do not think I ever noticed it. If you translate it I can save it at [[MediaWiki:Tooltip-n-randomimage/hr. Maybe it will work. --Jarekt (talk) 01:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

It is a tooltip (Load a random file [alt-shitf-x]) on Participate section of toolbox, Random file item. Translation is here. Let's try.--Ma▀▄Ga 13:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

 Done --Jarekt (talk) 13:47, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Great, it works. Can you help with translation of "User uploads" (and it's tooltip (A list of uploads by this user)) in toolbox on the left? I can't find it.--Ma▀▄Ga 17:43, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

User:MaGa, Try here. See also mw:Help:Extension:UploadsLink. --Jarekt (talk) 18:18, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Excellent. Thanks again.--Ma▀▄Ga 05:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Zašto - zato

Eliminiran sam doživotno sa hr.wikipedia zato što sam uradio Lično vrijeđanje? Kakve su to ličnosti kada ih vrijeđa njihovo slobodno odabrano ime korisnika (MaGa) i da su čelenke (MaGa i Bonč) hr.wikipedije.

Na njihove komentare sam odgovorio: Bravo MaGa, bravo čelenko! (koliko se sjećam). Šta je tu uvredljivo?! Kasnije sam pomislio da im je njihov pseudonim bio znakovit. Meni nije... tvrdoglavost mi sada tukne na takvo nešto.

PS:Nakon trajne zabrane, u historiji - povijesti mojih članaka nema Yahadzije, ali je tu MaGa/Bonch! Čestitamo, članci nisu tako loši - za kićenje tuđim perjem... Yahadzija (talk) 16:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Google translate is not able to provide translation that makes any sense. --Jarekt (talk) 01:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Delete Warning

Dear Jarekt Regarding: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dominik_STEIGER_ohne_Titel_1999_aus_der_Serie_Kulturcollagen.jpg The photographer has sent the permission to permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org one week ago. best Richard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard hilbert (talk • contribs) 10:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

 Thank you I cleared all the warnings and added license based on OTRS. However I don't speak German so the ticket will have to be processed by someone else. Best luck and thanks for sharing. --Jarekt (talk) 11:56, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Edit requests

Hi Jarek, thank you for your last fulfilling my request. In the meantime 7 minor improvements occured, so I need again an admin to

1. copy the content of {{Image generation/sandbox}} into {{Image generation}}. BTW, I needed an expansion of the following template with the parameter for "sandbox"; please
2. copy the content of {{Heavily used template/sandbox}} into {{Heavily used template}},
3. and the content of {{Heavily used template/sandbox/en}} into {{Heavily used template/en}}.

Thank you sarang♥사랑 11:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

sarang, you are proposing to add up to 5 parameters to {{Heavily used template}} that at the moment takes none. What problem are you trying to solve? I see you are trying to:

1. add 2 style parameters to Template:Heavily used template/layout,
2. allow alternative name for the namespace name
3. add "or use the sandbox" if appropriate

I do not understand the need for change 1 and 2. Change 3 I think is a good idea but I would do it based on if sandbox page exist or not. Also in the past that message was usually delivered by {{Use sandbox}} template, which I added to {{Image generation}} for time being. I did {{Image generation/sandbox}} changes, but moved {{Heavily used template}} + other stuff to /doc so you and others have easier access to it. --Jarekt (talk) 12:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your edits. The styles would offer a possibility to change the box which is currently centered and 80%; when it seems better to display it e.g. besides of a TOC it can be styled that way.

The namespace is most times either template, or in a few cases module. With more flexibility (if used!) adjustment will be possible.

You saw that I positioned the "heavily" preceding the /doc, but I won't mind that it is now part of it. It is rather an advantage to have it in the /doc from which I am not locked out (currently...); and of course it does not matter either that the "sandbox" is shown by another template. sarang♥사랑 14:05, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

New request

Hi Jarek, thank you for your last edits. Again several improvements and expansions became necessary, mainly for the treatment of {{Graphic Lab}}; so I need again your help, please

copy the content of {{Image generation/sandbox}} into {{Image generation}}. Of course it's well tested. Thank you -- sarang♥사랑 06:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-38

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Problems

• Last week's MediaWiki update was rolled back because of bugs. Creating new accounts did not work between 15 September 19:10 UTC and 16 September 12:50 UTC. [1][2]

Changes this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will hopefully be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 20 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 21 September. It will be on all wikis from 22 September (calendar). This is the version that was meant to go out last week.

Meetings

• You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 20 September at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
• You can join the next meeting with the Architecture committee. The topic this week is multi-content revisions. The meeting will be on 21 September at 21:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• Wikidata will start working on adding support for Wiktionary. The Wikidata development team is now taking one last look at the development plan. [3]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

22:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Category:Pages using authority control without Wikidata

Potrzebne są puste edycje, najlepiej by było to przebotować. Pozdrawiam, miłego dnia :-) Wieralee (talk) 11:08, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Nie spieszy mi się. Poczekam aż samo się zmieni. --Jarekt (talk) 13:02, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Fall of Mickiewicz Monument (1940).jpg

File:Fall of Mickiewicz Monument (1940).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Warsaw Uprising by Joachimczyk - Evacuation of Wounded - 12352.jpg

File:Warsaw Uprising by Joachimczyk - Evacuation of Wounded - 12352.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:WWII Krakow - 02.jpg

File:WWII Krakow - 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:51, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Bydgoszcz-rozstrzelanie zakładników 9.09.1939.jpg

File:Bydgoszcz-rozstrzelanie zakładników 9.09.1939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Warsaw ghetto - infant corpse.jpg

File:Warsaw ghetto - infant corpse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 09:07, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Zdjęcie posła Cezarego Tomczyka – prośba

Hej Jarku, piszę w nowej dla mnie sprawie: zwrócił się do nas poseł Cezary Tomczyk z prośbą o wymianę zdjęcia na pl-Wiki w haśle o nim. Wyjaśniłem mu wszystko (OTRS etc.), powiedział, że ma przekazane prawa autorskie do zdjęcia, i prześle zgodę. Otrzymalizmy także imię i nazwisko autora (Maciej Śmiarowski). Ku mojemu zaskoczeniu nie mogę go wgrać, gdyż ktoś już go wgrał. Jest tutaj. A tutaj jeszcze ktoś wgrał miniaturkę. Co z tym zrobić? Czy możesz go/je usunąć jako NPA, czy musimy czekać 7 dni? Czy też mam wysłać OTRS własnie na to zdjęcie, wgrane nie przeze mnie, a przez kogoś innego? Tylko wtedy prośba o poprawkę w nazwie pliku, tj. żeby była spacja pomiędzy imieniem, a nazwiskiem. Z góry dzięki za wskazówki:) Boston9 (talk) 17:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Ja bym przesłał zgodę, imię autora i zdjęcie do OTRS. Możesz także wspomnieć ze zdjęcie już jest przesłane na Commons pod nazwą File:CezaryTomczyk.jpg. Jak ci odpiszą z numerem biletu (16 cyfr) to mi napisz i ja na to popatrzę. Ale nawet jeśli inny członek OTRS się tym zajmie to wynik powinien być ten sam. Co do nazwy pliku to bym jej nie ruszał, nazwa pliku nie spełnia żadnego wymogu z listy Commons:File renaming. --Jarekt (talk) 17:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Tak przy okazji zobacz [4]. Wygląda na to ze pl:Wikipedysta:Elfhelm woli twoje zdjęcie od zdjęcia Macieja Śmiarowskiego i już wycofał 3 próby zmiany zdjęcia. --Jarekt (talk) 17:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-39

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• If your wiki wants numerical sorting in categories you can request it after a community decision. See how to request it. [5]
• When you edit text and mention a new username they are notified if you add your signature. Before this only happened under certain conditions. [6]
• Users are notified if they are mentioned in a section where you add your own signature even if you edit more than one section. Before, users were not notified if you edited more than one section in one edit. [7]

Problems

• The MediaWiki version that was supposed to come to the wikis two weeks ago was put on hold again because of new problems. The MediaWiki version after it is now on all wikis. [8][9]

Changes this week

• There will be no new MediaWiki version this week. [10]

Meetings

• You can join the next office hour with the Wikidata team. The meeting will be on September 27 at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• Abandoned tools on Tool Labs could be taken over by other developers. There is a new discussion on Meta about this. It will be discussed until 12 October and then voted on. [11]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

18:07, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

File:USS Iowa BB-4.jpg

File:USS Iowa BB-4.jpg is considered fulfilling the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its image description page. The following reason has been specified: This file is a duplicate of the following files: File:USS Iowa - NH 60249.jpg. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may request undeletion. All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

Revent^talk 18:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Usunięte dwa zdjęcia

Dzień dobry.

Bardzo proszę o pomoc w przywróceniu 2 plików. Wcześniej wgrywałem takie pliki i były potwierdzane jako zgodne z wymaganiami Commons, a te dwa teraz od razu zostały skasowane jako naruszenie praw autorskich File:Bartłomiej Misiewicz (2014).JPG (źródło https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-txwsWCdm0s i File:Popek (raper).JPG (źródło https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ocwxsi0xd-8). Według mnie nie ma żadnych zastrzeżeń, oba mają licencję CC. Bartłomieja Misiewicza wgrał ascotv, który zajmuje się takimi politycznymi nagraniami, natomiast nagranie rapera (jak widać) jest ewidentnie maksymalnie amatorskie, a ten użytkownik wgrał jeszcze kilka z tego samego koncertu.

Dziękuję

Artur Andrzej (talk) 20:15, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

 Done Artur Andrzej, Wygląda na to ze File:Popek.JPG i File:Popek (raper).JPG są takie same. Którą trzymać? --Jarekt (talk) 12:33, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Your bot claimed...

Your bot claimed: "No required license templates were detected at this file page." I explicitly linked to the official page for the license in question -- the same link used on the source page.

The text of Template:Image license has gone through various iterations. The current wording seems to claim something is required that I have never seen in any image:

1. URL of the source page
2. URL to the page of the license linked to on the original source page
3. An instantiation of a valid commons license template

I am going to repeat, I have never seen an image that has all three of the things this template claims are required.

I put all my image in the public domain, but I believe that practically all of our images that are under a free license are from a very small number of licenses... A handful of CC licenses, GFDL, and a handful of others.

Why doesn't your bot look at the URL in the permission field? If it is the URL to one of the dozen or so licenses used on practically all our images, why doesn't your bot either replace that URL with the appropriate license template, or leave a note on the uploader's talk page telling them what tag maps to that license URL? Geo Swan (talk) 21:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Geo Swan I did not use a bot. I just noticed that your file is missing a license template so I tagged it with {{No license since}} template so it can be fixed. If I have time, I often stop and fix such files but today I was busy so I just tagged it. Template:Image license seems fine and your file seems fine but you are missing "An instantiation of a valid commons license template". --Jarekt (talk) 03:07, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Polish stamps

Cześć, na przykładzie tej pracy – czy znaczki PP obejmuje art. 4 pkt 1 i 2 ustawy? Zawsze sądziłem, że nie. Boston9 (talk) 12:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Nikt nie wie jaka jest sytuacja prawna znaczków polskich ale pare lat temu skasowaliśmy większość naszych zbiorów. Zobacz Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Poland i Commons_talk:Stamps/Public_domain#Polish_stamps_are_copyrighted. --Jarekt (talk) 12:27, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

File: Map of Silk Roads over the Roof of Asia.jpg

Hi Jarekt, I am unsure if this file has copyright clearance. The publisher allows for use of a single work, as per their website, which states: “Cambridge University Press grants permission freely for the reproduction in another work of a short prose extract (less than 400 words), a single figure or a single table in which it holds rights (see the important caveat in the Notes below). In such cases a request for permission need not be submitted, but the reproduced material must be accompanied by a full citation of the original source.”

If this still does not clear this file to be uploaded, then please remove it. Thanks, "Riaz Dean" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riaz Dean (talk • contribs) 00:52, 01 October 2016 (UTC)

User:Riaz Dean, I do not think that permission is sufficient. --Jarekt (talk) 02:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)