Commons:File renaming

Shortcut: COM:FR · COM:MOVE

This project page in other languages:

This page is considered an official guideline on Wikimedia Commons.

It illustrates standards or behaviors which most editors agree with in principle and generally follow. Feel free to update the page as needed, but please use the discussion page to propose major changes.

The file rename function allows renaming (or "moving") of files, which works basically the same way as "normal" page moves. The function is only available to administrators and file movers. Requests to become a filemover are listed at Commons:Requests for rights#Filemover.

Which files should be renamed?

Whether a file name is perceived to be suitable often depends on the familiarity of the individual with the subject, which is often the place depicted. It also occurs that items are known under different terms to different contributors or they believe entities are primarily well-known under the term they are used with to describe this entity, neglecting cultural differences, even within countries. Not of less importance is the purpose the file name is believed to have; contributors frequently categorizing files have different demands from those who create, process, manage and upload them. Uploaders often have schemas naming their files; moving files might break them. If possible, language and schema should be preserved, as well as the camera or catalogue number.

Commons:File naming describes how files should be named. In general, Commons aims to provide stable file names as there might be external file clients and file moving involves significant human and computing resources. Thus renaming should be used with caution. Currently there are six widely undisputed uses for rename requests:

#	Aim	Examples (old name)	Examples (new name)
1.	At the original uploader’s request.^[1]
2.	To change from a meaningless or ambiguous name to a name that describes what the image particularly displays.^[2]	File:DSC 1342.jpg^**	File:Pretoria Venningpark DSC 1342.jpg
		File:20110428 OH K1023900 0014.JPG - Flickr - NZ Defence Force.jpg^**	File:Helicopter A109LUH(NZ) by NZ Defence Force.jpg
		File:20120519 3349.CR2.png^**	File:Sebkha-Chott 3349.png
		File:Paris 319.jpg^**	File:Paris 75018 Rue Norvins no 018 Le Consulat z.jpg
		File:Smartphone.jpg^**	File:Samsung Galaxy Note series (Original, II, and 3).jpg
		File:RAS.jpg^**	File:Rodrigo Arias Sánchez.jpg
		File:Flickr - law keven - Anybody know a Good Dentist^......Happy Furry Friday Everybody...-O))).jpg^**	File:Lion-tailed Macaque, Colchester Zoo, England.jpg
		File:Louvre 12.jpg^**	File:Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci.jpg
3.	To correct obvious errors in file names, including misspelled proper nouns, incorrect dates, and misidentified objects or organisms.^[3]	File:Ayres Rock 3.png File:Van Gogh portrait 1787.jpg File:Unknown insect 02.jpg	File:Ayers Rock 3.png File:Van Gogh portrait 1887.jpg File:Hogna radiata 02.jpg
4.	To harmonize the file names of a set of images: so that only one part of all names differs.^[4]	File:Bhf-BS-Icon.svg File:Icon HST bs 1.svg File:Dst symbol.svg	File:BSicon BHF.svg File:BSicon HST.svg File:BSicon DST.svg
5.	To change a file name that would be a violation of Commons’ policies and guidelines if it appeared elsewhere on the project as text. This includes gratuitous vulgarity, personal attacks/harassment, blatant advertising, and cases where revision deletion would be authorized.^[5]	File:Stupid fat idiot.jpg File:Buy now NEW PAINT! 555-6200.png	File:<Name of the person>.jpg File:2007 pink Honda Accord.png
6.	Non-controversial maintenance and bug fixes, including fixing double extensions, invalid or incorrect extensions, character handling problems, and other similar technical issues.^[6]	File:Map of Asia.svg.png File:Computer mouse.jpe	File:Map of Asia.png File:Computer mouse.jpg

Additional information: Please consider creating file redirects instead, where applicable and possible. They are cheap, usually do not break anything and are easily edited or deleted, if required.

↑ Unless there is a compelling reason not to, uploader requests should be honored. This is a courtesy, not an absolute, however. If a file mover feels that a proposed new name is disruptive or inappropriate, they can suggest a different name or decline the request.
↑ Including:
1. Absolutely no information at all
  Composed entirely of random letters, numbers, and words like “Flickr”, “original”, and “crop”, which do not describe the subject of the image, but may indicate its upload history
2. Only information is the photographer or rights holder
  The only piece of meaningful information is the name of the photographer or the holder of the copyright
3. Only information is the date
  Only piece of meaningful information is the date that the photograph was taken on
4. Only information is the location (broad)
  The only piece of meaningful information is a broad location, such as a city, province, or country. In this case, the location is so large that an average person would not be able to figure out where the image was taken or what the image depicted, without assistance from someone that knows the area.
5. Generic category rather than specific item
  The only piece of meaningful information is a word, such as “smartphone” or “screenshot”, which broadly describes the subject of the file, but does not impart any information that would help someone identify the specific object depicted. This is not just restricted to inanimate objects, it also applies to broad titles or groupings, such as “queen” or “bird”.
6. Acronyms and initials
  The only piece of meaningful information is an acronym or a person’s initials. This differs from “Absolutely no information at all” in that the acronym or initials are related to the subject of the file, even if it takes a second to figure out how.
7. Names that are not meaningless, but do not describe the file
  Contains a coherent description or message that do not describe the subject of the file. Does not apply in cases where the name of the file is the title given to a work of art by the artist that created it, even if the name has nothing to do with what is depicted (for example, many works of Dadaism)
8. Images where the information in the filename, while normally acceptable, is inappropriate for the specific content
Not including: Specific locations, such as a park, an individual building, or an event.
↑ If an object or organism was incorrectly identified in the file name (such as calling a Sylvilagus floridanus by the name “File:Sylvilagus audubonii.jpg”), this criterion covers renaming the image. If the file name includes words like “unidentified” or “unknown” when describing an object or organism, and that object or organism has been identified, this criterion also covers the change. This criterion does not, however, cover moving a file from its common usage name to its scientific or technical name.
↑ Just because images share a category does not mean that they are part of a set. There are two scenarios that this criterion is designed for. First, certain complex templates (such as those that use BSicons or that display football kits) assume that the images used in them will follow a specific naming convention. Wikisource also uses a specific naming convention for the source files they transcribe. Second, files that form parts of a whole (such as scans from the same book or large images that are divided into smaller portions due to Commons’ upload size restriction) should follow the same naming convention so that they appear together, in order, in categories and lists.
↑ Note that Commons’ neutral point of view differs significantly from that of English Wikipedia. A file like “File:Taiwanese Tiaoyutai islands map.png” would be acceptable on Commons, even though it is not neutrally titled (see here). This does not mean that all non-neutrally worded titles are acceptable, however. An image of a person with the name “File:1BIGGest_nOSE_everS33n.JPG” would not enjoy the same protection.
↑ This is not a catch-all for anything that doesn't fit one of the above. This is for specific technical problems, generally which have a Phabricator task and have been the subject of community discussion.

View →the discussion that lead to the selection of these criteria.

Which files should not be renamed?

As a matter of principle it's best to leave all files with generally valid names at their locations, even if slightly better names may exist. So for example:

#	Criteria to decline	Examples (old name)	Examples (new name)
1.	Files should NOT be renamed only because the new name looks a bit better.	File:TowerBridge'09.jpg	File:Tower_Bridge_2009.jpg
2.	Files should NOT be renamed only because the filename is not English and/or is not correctly capitalized. Remember, Commons is a multilingual project, so there's no reason to favor English over other languages.	File:Rathaus_bremen.jpg	File:Bremen_town_hall.jpg
3.	If a filename in a local project conflicts with a filename at Commons, the file in the local project should be renamed. Renaming it at Commons would mean changing it in 700+ projects instead of just one.
4.	Files with copyright issues should NOT be renamed until copyright issues are resolved. There is no reason to rename a file if it is going to be deleted on copyright grounds.

Additional naming conventions and exceptions from the above list might be discussed for specific projects.

How to rename a file?

Movefile gadget

Only Commons administrators, file movers and Wikimedia stewards can rename files for now. If you belong to any of those groups, and therefore have the movefile right, just use the "move" tab as you would normally do to a regular page.

If you can't rename files, you can request a move by putting the template

{{rename|newname.ext|rationale number|reason=optional text reason}}

at the top of the image description page (click "more → move" near the top right). An editor with filemoving rights will perform the move if it conforms to the guidelines described above. If you have a user account at Commons: For easily requesting rename of a file you can use the "move" on the file page (provided by the default gadget RenameLink (documentation)).

Responding editors should follow the instructions on the template. In most cases, a file redirect should be left on the original page, except if it is a misleading or promotional name.

Redirects

When you move (rename) a file by using the move tab the old title will automatically become a redirect page to the new title. Additionally urls to thumbnails of the old file name will also redirect (however, direct links to the full size version of the file will not redirect). Redirects to the moved file are automatically updated when using Move & Replace to avoid double redirects.^[1] If you do not use Move & Replace, you'll have to update all redirects to the file manually.

Is there a log of file renames?

All file renamings are recorded in the Move log which is a log for all moves in all namespaces. There's no namespace filter for "files only" available yet.

Current file movers

List of all file movers (currently 1,061).
All administrators have access to the movefile tool as well (currently 241).

References

↑ MediaWiki:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete.js

[1] Unless there is a compelling reason not to, uploader requests should be honored. This is a courtesy, not an absolute, however. If a file mover feels that a proposed new name is disruptive or inappropriate, they can suggest a different name or decline the request.

[2] Including:

Absolutely no information at all
Composed entirely of random letters, numbers, and words like “Flickr”, “original”, and “crop”, which do not describe the subject of the image, but may indicate its upload history

Only information is the photographer or rights holder
The only piece of meaningful information is the name of the photographer or the holder of the copyright

Only information is the date
Only piece of meaningful information is the date that the photograph was taken on

Only information is the location (broad)
The only piece of meaningful information is a broad location, such as a city, province, or country. In this case, the location is so large that an average person would not be able to figure out where the image was taken or what the image depicted, without assistance from someone that knows the area.

Generic category rather than specific item
The only piece of meaningful information is a word, such as “smartphone” or “screenshot”, which broadly describes the subject of the file, but does not impart any information that would help someone identify the specific object depicted. This is not just restricted to inanimate objects, it also applies to broad titles or groupings, such as “queen” or “bird”.

Acronyms and initials
The only piece of meaningful information is an acronym or a person’s initials. This differs from “Absolutely no information at all” in that the acronym or initials are related to the subject of the file, even if it takes a second to figure out how.

Names that are not meaningless, but do not describe the file
Contains a coherent description or message that do not describe the subject of the file. Does not apply in cases where the name of the file is the title given to a work of art by the artist that created it, even if the name has nothing to do with what is depicted (for example, many works of Dadaism)

Images where the information in the filename, while normally acceptable, is inappropriate for the specific content

Not including: Specific locations, such as a park, an individual building, or an event.

[3] Absolutely no information at all
Composed entirely of random letters, numbers, and words like “Flickr”, “original”, and “crop”, which do not describe the subject of the image, but may indicate its upload history

[4] Only information is the photographer or rights holder
The only piece of meaningful information is the name of the photographer or the holder of the copyright

[5] Only information is the date
Only piece of meaningful information is the date that the photograph was taken on

[6] Only information is the location (broad)
The only piece of meaningful information is a broad location, such as a city, province, or country. In this case, the location is so large that an average person would not be able to figure out where the image was taken or what the image depicted, without assistance from someone that knows the area.

[7] Generic category rather than specific item
The only piece of meaningful information is a word, such as “smartphone” or “screenshot”, which broadly describes the subject of the file, but does not impart any information that would help someone identify the specific object depicted. This is not just restricted to inanimate objects, it also applies to broad titles or groupings, such as “queen” or “bird”.

[8] Acronyms and initials
The only piece of meaningful information is an acronym or a person’s initials. This differs from “Absolutely no information at all” in that the acronym or initials are related to the subject of the file, even if it takes a second to figure out how.

[9] Names that are not meaningless, but do not describe the file
Contains a coherent description or message that do not describe the subject of the file. Does not apply in cases where the name of the file is the title given to a work of art by the artist that created it, even if the name has nothing to do with what is depicted (for example, many works of Dadaism)

[10] Images where the information in the filename, while normally acceptable, is inappropriate for the specific content

[3] If an object or organism was incorrectly identified in the file name (such as calling a Sylvilagus floridanus by the name “File:Sylvilagus audubonii.jpg”), this criterion covers renaming the image. If the file name includes words like “unidentified” or “unknown” when describing an object or organism, and that object or organism has been identified, this criterion also covers the change. This criterion does not, however, cover moving a file from its common usage name to its scientific or technical name.

[4] Just because images share a category does not mean that they are part of a set. There are two scenarios that this criterion is designed for. First, certain complex templates (such as those that use BSicons or that display football kits) assume that the images used in them will follow a specific naming convention. Wikisource also uses a specific naming convention for the source files they transcribe. Second, files that form parts of a whole (such as scans from the same book or large images that are divided into smaller portions due to Commons’ upload size restriction) should follow the same naming convention so that they appear together, in order, in categories and lists.

[5] Note that Commons’ neutral point of view differs significantly from that of English Wikipedia. A file like “File:Taiwanese Tiaoyutai islands map.png” would be acceptable on Commons, even though it is not neutrally titled (see here). This does not mean that all non-neutrally worded titles are acceptable, however. An image of a person with the name “File:1BIGGest_nOSE_everS33n.JPG” would not enjoy the same protection.

[6] This is not a catch-all for anything that doesn't fit one of the above. This is for specific technical problems, generally which have a Phabricator task and have been the subject of community discussion.

[15] Absolutely no information at all
Composed entirely of random letters, numbers, and words like “Flickr”, “original”, and “crop”, which do not describe the subject of the image, but may indicate its upload history

[16] Only information is the photographer or rights holder
The only piece of meaningful information is the name of the photographer or the holder of the copyright

[17] Only information is the date
Only piece of meaningful information is the date that the photograph was taken on

[18] Only information is the location (broad)
The only piece of meaningful information is a broad location, such as a city, province, or country. In this case, the location is so large that an average person would not be able to figure out where the image was taken or what the image depicted, without assistance from someone that knows the area.

[19] Generic category rather than specific item
The only piece of meaningful information is a word, such as “smartphone” or “screenshot”, which broadly describes the subject of the file, but does not impart any information that would help someone identify the specific object depicted. This is not just restricted to inanimate objects, it also applies to broad titles or groupings, such as “queen” or “bird”.

[20] Acronyms and initials
The only piece of meaningful information is an acronym or a person’s initials. This differs from “Absolutely no information at all” in that the acronym or initials are related to the subject of the file, even if it takes a second to figure out how.

[21] Names that are not meaningless, but do not describe the file
Contains a coherent description or message that do not describe the subject of the file. Does not apply in cases where the name of the file is the title given to a work of art by the artist that created it, even if the name has nothing to do with what is depicted (for example, many works of Dadaism)

[22] Images where the information in the filename, while normally acceptable, is inappropriate for the specific content

[AQD-7] MediaWiki:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete.js

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[1]

Commons:File renaming

Contents

Which files should be renamed?

Which files should not be renamed?

How to rename a file?

Redirects

Is there a log of file renames?

Current file movers

See also

References

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigate

Participate

Print/export

In other projects

Tools

In Wikipedia