User talk:Simon04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

A barnstar for you![edit]

Special Barnstar Hires.png The Special Barnstar
Dir gebührt der Spezialorden in der Spectralfarb-Version für dein Locator-Tool. Ohne Hintergedanken!! Einfach weil er schön ist! Vielen Dank! Hubertl 08:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Lizenzfrage[edit]

Hallo Simon04, komme mit den Lizenzen der Bilder in Category:Images from the Vorarlberger Landesrepositorium/wrong collection nicht klar. Die Bilder sind 1929 aufgenommen, lt. volare Rechte: Keine Lizenz. D.h. nach meinem Verständnis musst du eine passende Lizenz ergänzen und nachweisen, dass der Fotograf Heim schon 70 Jahre tot ist. collection=null ist jedenfalls keine zulässige Verwendung der Vorlage. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

lt. [1] handelt es sich mit großer Wahrscheinlichkeit um Leonhard Heim (1873–1946) und dessen Bilder wären erst 2017 frei. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:54, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Hallo Herzi Pinki! Danke für deine Nachricht und deine Recherchen. collection=null betrifft die Bilder File:Eisbrechen-Bodensee-1929-03-10.tiff, File:Eisfest Bregenz Bodensee-1929-02-17a.tiff, File:Eisfest Bregenz Bodensee-1929-02-17b.tiff. Bei den Fotos habe ich »keine Lizenz« übersehen. Nach deinen Recherchen müssen die Fotos wohl bis 2017 von Commons verschwinden. Die meisten anderen Fotos in Category:Images from the Vorarlberger Landesrepositorium/wrong collection, bspw. File:Alte-Hungerburgbahn-Talstation-39292.jpg, sind laut Volare von der Sammlung Rhomberg mit Lizens CC-BY-4.0 – warum sind diese Bilder problematisch? – Simon04 (talk) 15:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Ich hatte zwischendurch nur die 3 von Heim in der angesprochenen Kategorie. Dann aber den Rhomberg als problematisch gesehen und auch hierher verschoben. Siehe auch User_talk:Plani#Volare. Die Angaben sind widersprüchlich. Und die Frage ist, was sollen wir hinschreiben, Risch-Lau oder Rhomberg. Eine frei verfügbare Collection Rhomberg gibt es nicht (auf der Einstiegsseite), die Einzelbilder sind mit CC-by-4.0 markiert. Bei den drei Bildern wäre es gut, den Autor mit Lebensdaten zu ergänzen (wenn du mit mir übereinstimmst), die Bilder werden dann 2017 automatisch wiederhergestellt. Weiß allerdings nicht welches Template das bewerkstelligt. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Eisbrechen-Bodensee-1929-03-10.tiff[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Eisbrechen-Bodensee-1929-03-10.tiff. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 17:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Eisfest Bregenz Bodensee-1929-02-17a.tiff[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Eisfest Bregenz Bodensee-1929-02-17a.tiff. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 17:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Eisfest Bregenz Bodensee-1929-02-17b.tiff[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Eisfest Bregenz Bodensee-1929-02-17b.tiff. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 17:07, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Eisbrechen-Bodensee-1929-03-10.tiff[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Eisbrechen-Bodensee-1929-03-10.tiff has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Green Giant (talk) 14:39, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Eisfest Bregenz Bodensee-1929-02-17a.tiff[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Eisfest Bregenz Bodensee-1929-02-17a.tiff has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Green Giant (talk) 14:47, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Eisfest Bregenz Bodensee-1929-02-17b.tiff[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Eisfest Bregenz Bodensee-1929-02-17b.tiff has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Green Giant (talk) 14:50, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Danke für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Österreich[edit]

WLE logo

Die Jury bewertet nun alle eingereichten Fotos. Die Preisträger geben wir am 31. Juli 2016 auf der Website wikilovesearth.at bekannt.

Bei dieser Gelegenheit möchte ich dich an die WikiCon 2016 Mitte September erinnern, für die noch bis 30. Juni Programmvorschläge eingereicht werden können. Wikimedia Österreich wird wieder Stipendien für die Teilnahme zur Verfügung stellen, genauere Infos veröffentlichen wir Ende Juni. Bei Fragen dazu kannst du dich gerne an uns wenden: verein@wikimedia.at. Liebe Grüße --Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) 13:19, 15 June 2016 (UTC)