Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcut
COM:VIC
This project page in other languages:

English | فارسی | français | polski | русский | +/−

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations
Valued image seal.svg

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Skip to current candidates Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.


Renomination[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the VIC subpages of the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates[edit]

How to review an image[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure[edit]

  • On the review page the image <!!--or image set--> is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info My information. -- Example
You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question My question. -- Example
You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.


How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates[edit]

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
22,961 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
20,081 (87.5%) 
Undecided
  
1,230 (5.4%) 
Declined
  
1,650 (7.2%) 



New valued image nominations[edit]

   
Mudhusudan Dutta.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Mar11 (talk) on 2016-09-26 19:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Category:Michael Madhusudan Dutt
Used in:
en
Open for review.
Zalawen Türsturz 1797.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-09-29 06:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Coat of arms (1797) in Trier-Zurlauben, Germany

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Monument to the Antarctic Treaty.jpg
View promotion
Nominated by:
Tsy1980 (talk) on 2016-09-29 10:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Antarctic Treaty Monument (Historic Site or Monument No. 82)
Used in:
en:Historic Sites and Monuments in Antarctica
Reason:
The only image of the HSM 82 -- Tsy1980 (talk)

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Bacopa madagascariensis 001.JPG
View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-09-29 11:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Bacopa madagascariensis (Madagascan Bacopa), habitus

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:35, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICbot at 0:18 or 12:18 (UTC)
Edmund Erlemann cropped.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Neozoon (talk) on 2016-09-29 15:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Edmund Erlemann
Used in:
Edmund Erlemann (DE)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
2016 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul. Kościelna 11 1.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jacek Halicki (talk) on 2016-09-29 16:28 (UTC)
Scope:
11 Kościelna Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, exposure from NW

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:56, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Knight's Hall Meersburg.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-09-29 16:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Meersburg Castle, knight's hall

Symbol support vote.svg Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:58, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Bovine articulation (tarsus).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Lucas.Belo (talk) on 2016-09-29 18:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Bovine articulation Bovinus Tarsum (Cattle) legs
Used in:
EN, FR
Open for review.
Camel skull (MAV FMVZ USP).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Lucas.Belo (talk) on 2016-09-29 18:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Camelus Calvariae (Camel skull)
Used in:
EN, PT, ES

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Colorization is not natural that skull can not represent the entire skull of this species. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Manduca rustica harterti MHNT CUT 2010 0 68 Neufchâteau Sainte Marie Guadeloupe dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-09-30 05:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Manduca rustica harterti male dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Belleserre - Le Monument aux Morts.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-09-30 05:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Belleserre, Tarn France, War memorial
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Frari (Venice) nave left - Monument to Girolamo Venier.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-09-30 05:20 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari - Venice - Monument to Girolamo Venier
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:17, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
David Brkic - Basket Brescia Leonessa 2013.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2016-09-30 09:45 (UTC)
Scope:
David Brkic
Used in:
es:David Brkic, it:David Brkic

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pietrangelo Buttafuoco - International Journalism Festival 2015.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2016-09-30 09:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Pietrangelo Buttafuoco
Used in:
fr:Pietrangelo Buttafuoco, it:Pietrangelo Buttafuoco, it:q:Pietrangelo Buttafuoco

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Carnival Spirit, Sydney 2013.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Martinvl (talk) on 2016-09-30 12:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Carnival Spirit (ship)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment it would be useful that this image is used.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Fuchsia 'Katinka'.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2016-09-30 17:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Fuchsia 'Katinka' Flowers en buds.

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Cantlop Bridge 2016.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-09-30 19:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Cantlop Bridge - from the north-west
Used in:
Reason:
An early cast-iron bridge by Thomas Telford -- DeFacto (talk).
Open for review.
Viviparus ater 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-09-30 19:49 (UTC)
Scope:
Viviparus ater (Italian River Snail), shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Baldringen wayside cross(2-2).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-09-30 20:20 (UTC)
Scope:
NW view of Baldringen, Germany
Used in:
de:Baldringen

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Manduca rustica harterti MHNT CUT 2010 0 68 Neufchâteau Sainte Marie Guadeloupe ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-10-01 05:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Manduca rustica harterti male ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:15, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Rio di Santa Marina (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-10-01 05:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Rio di Santa Marina (Venice). View from Ponte del Cristo to Ponte Conzafelzi

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Frari (Venice) nave left - The Franciscan tree by Pietro Negri 1670.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-10-01 05:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari- Venice - The Franciscan tree by Pietro Negri 1670

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Juan Diaz Canales - Lucca Comics & Games 2015.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Jaqen (talk) on 2016-10-01 07:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Juan Diaz Canales
Used in:
ca:Juan Díaz Canales, en:Juan Díaz Canales, fi:Juan Diaz Canales, it:Juan Díaz Canales

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Pile dweller - Unteruhldingen.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-10-01 07:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Uhldingen-Mühlhofen, statue of a pile dweller

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Fruit Chafer beetle (Anisorrhina algoensis) female.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-10-01 10:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Anisorrhina algoensis (Fruit Chafer beetle) female

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Plum dung beetle (Anachalcos convexus).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-10-01 10:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Anachalcos convexus (Plum dung beetle) dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Plum dung beetle (Anachalcos convexus) composite.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-10-01 11:24 (UTC)
Scope:
Anachalcos convexus (Plum dung beetle) navigation process

Symbol support vote.svg Support very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Ford Thames E83W dropside 1957.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
DeFacto (talk). on 2016-10-01 17:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Thames E83W dropside
Used in:
de:Ford Truck, de:Fordson E83W, en:Fordson E83W, fa:فورد ای۸۳دبلیو

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Turbo chinensis 01.JPG
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-10-01 17:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Turbo chinensis, shell

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Langia zenzeroides zenzeroides MHNT CUT 2010 0 Khasi Hills Assam female dorsal.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-10-02 05:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Langia zenzeroides zenzeroides mounted specimen female dorsal

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. Charles (talk) 12:03, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Palazzo Soranzo Van Axel (Venice).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-10-02 06:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Palazzo Soranzo Van Axel (Venice). View from Ponte de le erbe.
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Frari (Venice) nave left - The tympanum of the door bell tower High relief of the fourteenth.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-10-02 06:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari- Venezia - The tympanum of the door bell tower High relief

best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Schoenbrunn Palace as seen from Neptune Fountain, September 2016.jpg
View (withdrawn)
Nominated by:
Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2016-10-02 09:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Palace of Schönbrunn as seen through Neptune Fountain
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment good FP candidate, but not I think VI. Charles (talk) 12:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I guess you're right! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Can be closed as declined
Sand wasp (Stizus fuscipennis).jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-10-02 12:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Stizus fuscipennis (Sand wasp)

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Antillean malachite (Siproeta stelenes stelenes).JPG
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-10-02 12:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Siproeta stelenes stelenes (Antillean malachite) dorsal
Open for review.
Jamaican albatross (Appias drusilla castalia) male.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-10-02 12:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Appias drusilla castalia (Jamaican albatross) male

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Map of Lake Constance - Mainau.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2016-10-02 12:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Map of Lake Constance, Mainau
Open for review.
Såheim hydropower station in Rjukan.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Frankemann (talk) on 2016-10-02 20:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Såheim kraftverk
Used in:
Såheim Hydroelectric Power Station, Såheim kraftverk, Energi i Norge
Reason:
Very good picture of a particularly beautiful hydropower plant -- Frankemann (talk)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Town hall of Almadrones.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Ivanhercaz | Discusión Plume pen w.png on 2016-10-02 22:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Facade of Town hall of Almadrones Spain
Used in:
10 articles in 10 languages different and its respective item in Wikidata.
Reason:
The main reason to nominate that photo is because it illustrate a little municipality without photograph until this month as part of the Category:Images of municipalities of Spain without photograph WLM 2016 and No Spanish municipality without photo ―in Spanish, Ningún municipio español sin fotografía―. I think that it is very important to save photographs of this little municipalities because we have the danger of lose it, so we should try to preserve it in images. -- Ivanhercaz | Discusión Plume pen w.png

Symbol support vote.svg Support Useful : We must shoot all the municipalities and especially smaller. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Archaeodontosaurus! Regards, Ivanhercaz | Discusión Plume pen w.png 09:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I agree, but it should be possible to take pictures of buildings like this with much better lighting conditions. Charles (talk) 08:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Charles: yes, I imagine that there will be days with better lighting conditions but I haven't the possibility to take it because, for me, it is very difficult to go. What I only can do is increase the light in the photo, although I think it is fine at this moment. Regards, Ivanhercaz | Discusión Plume pen w.png 09:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Langia zenzeroides zenzeroides MHNT CUT 2010 0 Khasi Hills Assam female ventral.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-10-03 05:39 (UTC)
Scope:
Langia zenzeroides zenzeroides mounted specimen female ventral

Symbol support vote.svg Support useful. Charles (talk) 08:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Balma - Monument aux Morts.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-10-03 05:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Balma-Lasbordes, Haute-Garonne France, War memorial
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Open for review.
Frari (Venice) nave right - Monument to Giuseppe Bottari by Francesco Penso.jpg
Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2016-10-03 05:44 (UTC)
Scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari- Venice - Monument to Giuseppe Bottari by Francesco Cabianca

Symbol support vote.svg Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Open for review.
Common warthog (Phacochoerus africanus) male.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-10-03 08:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Phacochoerus africanus (Common warthog) male
Open for review.
Devil grasshopper (Diabolocatantops axillaris axillaris).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-10-03 08:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Diabolocatantops axillaris axillaris (Devil grasshopper) lateral view
Open for review.
Spur-throated grasshopper (Catantops humeralis).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Charles (talk) on 2016-10-03 08:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Catantops humeralis (Spur-throated grasshopper)
Open for review.
Akan MHNT.ETH.2010.25.009.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-10-03 10:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Akan Gold Weight, Balance scale with precision pointer and deep pans.
Open for review.
Akan MHNT.ETH.2010.25.010-fond blanc.jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2016-10-03 10:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Akan Gold Weight, Calabash with adornment. Gunpowder container
Open for review.
Olzheim Afelskreuz 1613 (1).jpg
Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Palauenc05 (talk) on 2016-10-03 12:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Wayside cross (1613) in Olzheim, Germany.
Used in:
de:Liste der Kulturdenkmäler in Olzheim
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates[edit]

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates[edit]

New valued image set nominations[edit]

Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

Closed valued image set candidates[edit]